Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] was consistent underexposure problem
From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 11:57:53 +0200
 
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 02:12
Subject: Re: [Leica] was consistent underexposure problem


> I guess what I don't understand is how the value added by
> the final assembly of susbsets can be so high as to dominate
> all the assembly that took place in Portugal, thereby allowing
> the "Made in Germany" stamping on the camera.

Perhaps the "made in Germany" stamp adds all the value, and thereby justifies
itself.  After all, "made in E.U." would be more accurate, but would add far
less value.

  -- Anthony