Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Leica 280 2.8 versus Canon 300 2.8, a challenge
From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 09:39:50 -0700

The ones are the right seem to have a greater depth of field.  I would guess
that this is the Leica.

> ----------
> From: 	Robert G. Stevens[SMTP:robsteve@hfx.andara.com]
> Reply To: 	leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Sent: 	Wednesday, August 18, 1999 9:22 AM
> To: 	leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: 	[Leica] Leica 280 2.8 versus Canon 300 2.8, a challenge
> 
> 
> 
> I have posted a web page with two soccer pictures, one taken with a Canon
> 300 2.8 EOS and EOS 1n with the other taken with a Leica 280 2.8 and R8.
> Why don't we do a survey and see if people can tell which is the Leica
> shot.  Both were done on the same film (RSX 100 II) and in the evening.
> One is on grass, the other on artificial turf and no direct sun.  If you
> click on the images, they will bring up a larger image.  Pay attention to
> detail in the black shorts.  Is the Leica picture the one on the left or
> the right?
> 
> http://home.istar.ca/~robsteve/photography/Misc.htm
> 
> The train pictures on the top of the page were both taken with the 180 APO
> Summicron on the older and less sharp RSX 100 film.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Robert
>