Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 8/17/99 7:31:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time, dprichards@uswest.net writes: << This becomes problematic, since the lens informs the body which frame lines to throw up based upon the lens' focal length. A teleconverter would necessarily be universal, that is, usable by various focal length lenses and, thus, unable to communicate focal length info to the body. Plus, since the M uses rangefinder, not reflex viewing, a tele-converter used with long lenses, which is the only application where a teleconverter has any real value, would result in a framing area so small as to be even less approximate, and therefore less valuable, than it is already. >> I happen to have a Komura 2x for the Leica M. By trial-and-error I found that the rangefinder patch is a good approximation of the 270mm view, the 180mm (90 + 2x) is between the 135 and the rangefinder patch. Of course these areas are ridiculously small but I consider the 2x an emergency tool only. Cambridge Camera sells the 2x's with a dark but useable multiframe finder for $500, but I bought mine for $75 without a finder and I make do. I'm sure if Leica were to make a 1.4 or 2x it would doubtless have goggles for the rangefinder/viewfinder and a means (either pass-through from the lens' cam or a manual selector lever) of bringing up the correct frameline.