Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm back from 2 wks in eastern Europe, happy to report that my 2 M6's and lenses functioned perfectly and returned intact. I had initially opted for the 15-28-50-90 combo, but at the last moment substituted the 35 ASPH Summicron for the 28 because I wanted another f/2 lens besides the 50. I came to regret that decision, because of having to grind my glasses into the eyepiece and twist from side to side to see the 35 frameline (and I have a .72 finder!). Finally I switched to my spare glasses which are smaller, sit closer to my eyes and are more flexible, and the problem was slightly lessened. As is always the case with me, with any camera system, the "normal" lens was the one I used the most. I used the "latest" 35-50-90 lenses because I specifically wanted top performance wide open so that I could shoot handheld at lower light levels, but compared to my '70's-vintage lenses the new ones are quite a bit larger and heavier which becomes very apparent after walking a few km with them. My Domke F4XB shoulder-belt bag was perfect for the kit; low-profile, secure (waist and shoulder straps) and small enough to carry on the metro and tour-bus without requiring a seat of its own! It also kept my Leicas bone-dry on a long walk in an unexpected downpour in Vienna. (The same downpour prevented me from visiting the Leica Shop there...major bummmer!) I found myself using the Heliar 15mm extensively in castles, churches and museums. It is a tiny, light lens and the finder is amazingly bright. The DOF is so great that lack of rangefinder coupling is a non-issue. I was not sorry I didn't bring a 21mm lens (I spent all my time in cities, otherwise I would have missed a 21). I used the 90 Elmarit least of all, but nonetheless it was indispensible for detail shots of intricate building features, and also at concerts and opera performances. For the latter I switched to Fuji 800. Incidentally, I opted to shoot negative film (Royal Gold 100 and a couple rolls of TCN and XP2) for the trip for a few reasons: 1) I knew I'd be shooting a lot at mid-day in contrasty situations, 2) Wouldn't have much time to fiddle with exposure or bracket shots, 3) Negs scan as good or better and retain their greater tonal range when printed, and 4) everyone I know would rather look at an album than sit through a slideshow (my fault there, I'm sure). Experience I've had with Royal Gold 100 in the past has been superb, so I'm looking forward to the results. As a somewhat-collector and avowed camera-nut, I of course had my eyes peeled on the hordes of tourists. I did not see even one single M Leica. But to put this in proper perspective, I saw *no* Contaxes at all, and only 2 Leica R's (an elderly R3 with an elderly 50 Summilux carried by an equally elderly gentleman, and one R8 with a 28-70 3.5-4.5). I saw one Nikon F5 (again, with a slow 24-120 zoom), one pristine black F2 with the DP-12 finder, and one Nikkormat FTn. By contrast, there were hundreds of lower-level AF SLR's and (estimating) thousands of AF P&S's. There were also a few digital P&S's and a large number of compact camcorders. I felt very secure carrying $$$ of Leicas around, as it seemed as if no one gave it a second glance. Only when I had both M6's out did tourists stop me...and that was to ask me to take their group picture with their P&S (evidently I "looked like a pro" with 2 cameras around my neck). One Leica-user (but not carrying his Leica at the time) stopped me in the street in Prague to talk Leicas and give me his website URL where there are some very nice images to be seen. It is worth checking out: http://www.kocman.com I'm hoping to be able to post some images from my trip to a personal web page (if I can figure out how to do it).