Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]A few weeks ago I bought a non-leica 28mm, f3.5 and I am very happy with the results in color and B&W. The lens is made by KOBALUX in Japan and marketed by Bower and Adorama. It comes in a screw mount with a nice metal adaptor for the M, a better quality 28mm finder than my Leitz SA 21mm, hood and caps.It is a tiny lens, in chrome and with an old fashioned focus lever. At 3.5 most would say it is to slow but so far that has not been a problem for me I dont use a 28mm very much but I figuered for $399, what the heck. Steve Annapolis - ---------- >From: Walter S Delesandri <walt@jove.acs.unt.edu> >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: Re: [Leica] New Cosina Voigtlander lenses >Date: Tue, Jul 20, 1999, 10:57 AM > >I have a question about the flurry of "non-Leica" lenses that >have appeared over the last few years.... > >I understand that the "Adorama" lenses are marketed under several >names and might be from a company called "BOWER". > >Add to this the new Voigtlander (obviously japanese or korean?--"cosina"???) >lenses.... > >here's my question...are these lenses in quality metal focusing mounts, or some >form of "chromed" or "anodized" plastic, like so many of our late, junky >SLR lenses, even from "top" manufacturers..... > >I apologize for the ignorance, but I don't get to major cities/camera shows >to handle the 'real thing'.....I am considering buying a 21mm, of some >aftermarket make, but I don't want a plastic piece of crap (I.E>, I know >it ain't Leitz, but is it at least the quality of canon or nikkor RF?) > >BTW< all the info I've read about the OPTICAL performance of these lenses >is fine with me....slightly less than Leica quality, for a rarely used "effect" >lens, is OK....I'm mainly concerned about the mechanical/material quality. > > >Any input appreciated, >thanks, >Walt > >