Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Dan K wrote: > > >I am trying hard to comprehend what you are saying. How could anyone > come > >to a conclusion that the G glass is "between 10 to 30 percent less good > >that the M" without some form of precise and comprehensive comparative > >testing? > > Simple, because you are asking Leica users. Had you asked Contax G users > they would say they are just as good. > > Peter K >