Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark Rabiner wrote: >I did not suggest and I do not think that it is the case that Erwin did >an comprehensive article or test comparing the G to M systems. I do >recall him mentioning a few of the G lenses in passing and in those >writings implying that they were between 10 to 30 percent less good than >the M. So he would have had his hands on a few of them. I am trying hard to comprehend what you are saying. How could anyone come to a conclusion that the G glass is "between 10 to 30 percent less good that the M" without some form of precise and comprehensive comparative testing? >I'm almost positive Erwin has mentioned the Contax G lenes in his articles. We obviously still cannot take you seriously until the references to these articles are made available to us. Dan K.