Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/01/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]John Hudson writes: > At 11:23 23:01:99 -0700, "JeffS" <segawa@netone.com> wrote: > > >Dear Leica User's Group Member, > > > >Thank you for your recent submission; however, it does not meet our > current > >needs. > > > >Reason(s) for rejection: > >( ) Insufficient Leica content. We do request that as a minimum, 5% of > the > >words used be either "Leica" or refer to products of E. Leitz or Leica > >Camera AG. A list of acceptable words is enclosed. > > rest snipped > > Was I the only person receive this message via the list? > > Are messages to the list being automatically word scanned for content? *HOWL* [FX: sound of head banging on desk] Sorry John, but that had me in *tears* of laughter. I think you've been 'got' :-))))) David Morton | "Times are bad. Children no dmorton@journalist.co.uk | longer obey their parents and David.Morton@openconsulting.co.uk | everyone is writing a book." (+44) 171 917 6272 | Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC)