Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/01/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]JeffS wrote: > > Dear Leica User's Group Member, > > Thank you for your recent submission; however, it does not meet our current > needs. > > Reason(s) for rejection: > ( ) Insufficient Leica content. We do request that as a minimum, 5% of the > words used be either "Leica" or refer to products of E. Leitz or Leica > Camera AG. A list of acceptable words is enclosed. > > ( ) Topic has already been discussed __ months ago. > > ( ) Stupid and/or uninteresting > > ( ) Unacceptable discussion regarding concealment and/or defacement of Leica > logo. > > ( ) Discussion or, or comparison to, Japanese brands, including, but not > limited to, Minolta, Canon, Nikon and Hoya, is strictly prohibited, as is > any allusion to non-Germanic origins of E. Leitz and Leica Camera products, > with regards to design, materials or manufacture. > > Thank you for your participation in the Leica User's Group; we look forward > to serving you in the future. ( ) Topic has not been researched thoroughly and cross referenced thought the morgue of LUG digests and photographic encyclopedias including the ISO guidebook. ( ) Topic involves incorrect use of the English Language or makes up new words. ( ) Topic acknowledges existence of Class, Race, or ethnic origin. ( ) Topic uses the initials UV somewhere in a sentence. ( ) Topic expresses a defined opinion that is bound to be disagreeable to certain member os the club. ( ) Topic has slightly hard or ironic edge not counterbalanced by smiley face.