Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 03:13 PM 23/12/98 +0100, Martin wrote: >George Huczek wrote: >> is there any truth to this for newer lenses, or is it just part of >> the Leica mystique? > >Bokeh is not a myth. Internet links on Bokeh: [cut] Thanks for the links. I will read through them over the holidays. I am familiar with Bokeh. That's not the story. Bokeh may be only part of what may be responsible for this so-called 3D effect. Given the right film/developer combination, to produce fine grain and high acutance, the mythological 3D effect involves more than just opening up the lens and getting a pleasing soft background, I suspect. I can get that up close with a macro lens, but it is not necessarily the same. This weird 3D thing gives added dimensionality to the photo. A B&W film with distinct edge definition, yielding crisp Mackie lines, brings the subject out from the background, particularly where there are noticeable tonal differences between the main subject, and the background behind the subject. This may be as important a factor in this effect as the optics used. The effect also seems to be more prominent when the distance separating the main subject and the background falls within certain limits for a particular aperture. The human eye does the same kind of thing due to its accommodation, and similarities between the image formed by the camera, and how the mind perceives that photographed image may also have something to do with this, but I'm only speculating. This is probably the wrong forum to discuss the topic. It isn't likely that I will be able to convince anyone here that such an effect can be achieved using other brand-name lenses as well. Optics are only part of what might make this illusion appear. Lighting, film type, processing and other factors are likely involved, and so I'm suggesting that the effect isn't unique to Leica optics, that's all.