Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In answer to Eric Welch's question about the relative performance of the Leica and Zeiss 15mm lenses. Superwides were tested years ago by Popular Photography. Performance was presented in the form of MTF graphs. Besides the subject lenses, the Pentax 15mm lens and one other brand (Nikon?) were tested. The Zeiss and Leica lenses topped the others easily, but the Zeiss bested the Leica lens. Both demonstrated equal qualities in the center and at the edges, but the Leica version dropped below the Zeiss lens in the 2/3 out zone. How could that happen when it is well known that the two lenses are optically the same, with the optical elements probably manufactured by Zeiss, and, I presume, the manufacture of the mechanical components and assembly performed in the respective companies' factories. Sample variation is probably the best explanation. Another explanation is the specifications for performance of the respective companies. The Leica lens was sold by Leica, and it is assumed that the quality control department accepted it for sale. This brings up a question I have pondered for a long time. Why don't camera manufacturers publish their specifications for acceptable quality? Avery other provider of high end equipment, especially in the commercial market, is essentially forced to provide this information to provide a guarantee.