Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sorry I can't speak for the Nikon and Canon RF lenses but a better choice would be the later 35 3.5 Summaron. Of course you will need a separate viewfinder for your M3 and if you want the Leitz version be prepared to pay several hundred dollars for it. I would not be surprised if you could find an RF Summaron 2.8 (with "eyes") or even a bespectacled Summicron for a reasonable price which would perform better and not require the auxiliary finder. Regards, Nigel On Fri, 13 Nov 1998 22:28:16 -0500 Michael Garmisa <elmar@nyct.net> writes: >Can anyone offer some advice on the 35 elmar LTM. I understand that >there >are large difference from lens to lens (curved or flat field) other >than >that any comments? I would like to mount a 35 on my M3 and from an >economic standpoint it seems like a good option. Also how does this >lens >compare to its Nikon and Cannon counterparts. > >-- >Michael Garmisa <elmar@nyct.net> > ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]