Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It's interesting how the subject of the "best kind" of light comes up from time to time. Once again: light is light--at least as far as black and white film goes. It's true, a good photographer will make the most of whatever light can be had. But sometimes, there isn't the light that is needed, or the light that will adequately bring the subject to the film. Controlling is as much a part of picture taking as is the control of shutter speed or camera movement. I love working in the studio with strobes. It's a whole new world that gives the photographer absolute control of the lighting. It also teaches you a lot about how light registers on film and how it will move to paper. There is no right or wrong way to work. Clever, creative people will make the most of what there is, even if it happens to be a pile of gadgets. Joe Stephenson - -----Original Message----- From: Bob_Maxey@mtn.3com.com <Bob_Maxey@mtn.3com.com> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: Wednesday, November 04, 1998 5:32 PM Subject: [Leica] BALDERDASH >>>>When you use an M6, which is the ultimate of available natural light >> picture taking machines in the first place, then require flash, fill or >> otherwise, to take your pictures speaks of the lack of the photographer's >> ability to see light and make it work for him or her. > >Not to be angry, cranky or rude, but I think that anyone who suggests that >fill or flash "Speaks of the lack of the photographer's ability to see >light........" is a comment that is just plain wrong. I have a friend who >is expert in using fill flash, and I guarantee you can't tell he has used >the fill. Fill flash has long been suggested, and I would hazard a guess >that if you learn to use it correctly, you will use it often. > >I think a good photographer will know when and when not to use additional >light. > > >RM > >