Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Good read! Thanks! Raimo photos at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen nyt myös Kameralehden juttuja suomeksi - ---------- > From: Mike Dembinski <mdembin@it.com.pl> > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] One history of Leica Obsession > Date: 25. lokakuuta 1998 7:05 > > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 22:08:21 +0200 > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > From: Mike Dembinski <mdembin@it.com.pl> > Subject: Anatomy of Leica obsession > Cc: > Bcc: > X-Attachments: > > Having been introduced to LUG and the like-minded fellowship of Leica > obsessives, I'd like if I may to share with you the feelings of Leicosity. > > My introduction to photography began with the purchase in 1979 of a Zenit > TTL in Olsztyn, Poland. I recall the (mal)odour of its (n)ever ready case > and its ham-fisted construction. I sold it in England for a vast profit, > which helped me buy a Nikon EM, huge improvement over the Zenit. > Black-and-white interested me from the beginning; a Zenit UPA-5 enlarger > turned out reasonable prints for a beginner. And colour slides. I did those > too. > > I would have been happy with this black plastic SLR, it took reasonable > snaps with its Nikon E-series lens, good enough to enlarge to 10x8 or to > project onto a screen. I bought a 28mm lens, a 135mm lens and for a while > was blissfully satisfied in the innocence that was Early Photography. > > Until, that is, my friend Stan showed me his father's Zorki I (Leica II > copy). I was thrilled with its density - it was so heavy for its size, its > little windows, knurled knobs, the lens that you popped out, the very idea > of it was just so much more *pure* than my modern Japanese auto-exposure > only camera... > > At around this time I began looking into camera shop windows. I began > lusting after *cameras* for their own sake. In the window of City Camera > Exchange (Waterloo) I saw a camera called a 'Leeka' (had no idea how to > pronounce it then) which cost like 200 pounds... second hand... and it > didn't even have an auto exposure mode... or even a light meter... and it > was not an SLR. In those days, a Canon A1 body cost about the same and had > three auto exposure modes, took damn good optics and was Respected be > Anyone Who Knew as a Top Class Camera. > > In October 1980 I started a journalism course at London's City University, > a nearby library had good photography books. There I found a copy of Gianni > Rogliatti's 'Leica The First Fifty Years'. Now I was hooked. Weeks later I > bought my first Leica, a IIIb with a rather ropy Summar, which I soon > traded in for a 3.5cm Elmar. > > I had reached a threshold on my mystic path. Pictures were harder to take, > but required more thought. I had but one lens; I learned to get closer to > the subject; "Two rules in photography: One. Get Close. Two: Get closer > still." (who's quote?) The little Leica's small size and unobtrusiveness > allowed to me to take it everywhere and learn about street shooting using > depth of field. One day at Paddington Station, an old gent came up to me. > 'Leica, eh? the best.' I was still a student and this meant loads to me. > "I'll tell you how to get correct exposures without a meter. Say you have > 100 asa film. Set shutter to 1/100. Bright day use f16. Slightly cloudy f8. > Overcast: f4. Just remember to set the shutter to the reciprocal of the > film speed and adjust accordingly..." So the Weston Master IV had to be > relied on less and less. > > One day I found an old 1960s copy of Leica Fotografie, in German. There > inside was a picture of "Leicamann". A guy with an M-2, demonstrating how > to hold the camera vertically. That had me sold. I wanted to be Leicamann. > Urbane, cosmopolitan, several notches above the photoproletarians with > their Chinons and Cosinas with add-on motordrives, zooms and cheap > hammerhead flashguns. I then realised I had become a camera snob. Not for > me was impressing the unsophisticated. I wanted to impress the cognoscenti. > > A year past, into my first job. I found an M2, battered, brassy but usable > for 125 pounds in North London. Months elapsed before I could afford a > lens for it. A 35mm Summicron M-from-screw conversion. 150 pounds at City > Camera Exchange (Waterloo) New Year sale. > > Now I was in business. I took some of my best stuff with that camera and > lens, b&w of people out and about, documentary pics of elderly Poles living > in Britain, landscapes, transport themes, all developed and printed at home > in my darkroom (Gamer enlarger, EL-Nikkor 50mm f2.8 lens). Right up to > 20x16. > > As income became more and more disposable, so the Leica obsession got a > grip. Lenses, yeah, you can justify. But I started buying stuff I didn't > *need* (just *craved*). Like a second body (near-mint M3 S/S) and a third > body (used but useable M4). And last year an M6. One day, in Fox Talbot, > Tottenham Court Road, I was looking at a used M6. 'Too much'. That very > moment, a guy walked in of the street wanting to sell *his* M6 to Fox > Talbot. The shop assistant offered him 500 pounds less than the price their > M6 was displayed at. I 'pssst'd' the guy, we went outside and I offered him > the chance to split the difference. Next day we did the deal (after I'd > checked his M6 - perfect then, perfect now). > > Since then, the M6 is with me on all shoots (my new Minolta TC-1 being with > me EVERY day). The light meter has added a new ease to Leica photography. I > still miss shots through lack of autofocus and autoexposure. But 17 years > with Leica M and much of the process becomes instinctive. > > And I have a cheap way to satisfy the equipment craving; I collect old > Soviet rangefinders. Each Sunday, Warsaw plays host to one of Europe's > largest regular camera fairs, the Gielda Fotograficzna at the Stodola. > 30,000 sq ft of stands. Upstairs you get the Russians, bringing in all > maner of FEDs, Zorkis, Kievs, all at bargain-basement prices. The going > rate for a Kiev 4 (Contax II copy) is 70 zloties - less than 20 bucks. > Lenses, viewfinders, all there. Incidentally, a mecca for Leica fakes and > forgeries - gold Leicas, Wehrmacht and Luftwaffe Leicas, all mint fakes > made from Zorkis and FEDs. > > Good to have got that off my chest and shared it with people who *understand* >