Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 22:08:21 +0200 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us From: Mike Dembinski <mdembin@it.com.pl> Subject: Anatomy of Leica obsession Cc: Bcc: X-Attachments: Having been introduced to LUG and the like-minded fellowship of Leica obsessives, I'd like if I may to share with you the feelings of Leicosity. My introduction to photography began with the purchase in 1979 of a Zenit TTL in Olsztyn, Poland. I recall the (mal)odour of its (n)ever ready case and its ham-fisted construction. I sold it in England for a vast profit, which helped me buy a Nikon EM, huge improvement over the Zenit. Black-and-white interested me from the beginning; a Zenit UPA-5 enlarger turned out reasonable prints for a beginner. And colour slides. I did those too. I would have been happy with this black plastic SLR, it took reasonable snaps with its Nikon E-series lens, good enough to enlarge to 10x8 or to project onto a screen. I bought a 28mm lens, a 135mm lens and for a while was blissfully satisfied in the innocence that was Early Photography. Until, that is, my friend Stan showed me his father's Zorki I (Leica II copy). I was thrilled with its density - it was so heavy for its size, its little windows, knurled knobs, the lens that you popped out, the very idea of it was just so much more *pure* than my modern Japanese auto-exposure only camera... At around this time I began looking into camera shop windows. I began lusting after *cameras* for their own sake. In the window of City Camera Exchange (Waterloo) I saw a camera called a 'Leeka' (had no idea how to pronounce it then) which cost like 200 pounds... second hand... and it didn't even have an auto exposure mode... or even a light meter... and it was not an SLR. In those days, a Canon A1 body cost about the same and had three auto exposure modes, took damn good optics and was Respected be Anyone Who Knew as a Top Class Camera. In October 1980 I started a journalism course at London's City University, a nearby library had good photography books. There I found a copy of Gianni Rogliatti's 'Leica The First Fifty Years'. Now I was hooked. Weeks later I bought my first Leica, a IIIb with a rather ropy Summar, which I soon traded in for a 3.5cm Elmar. I had reached a threshold on my mystic path. Pictures were harder to take, but required more thought. I had but one lens; I learned to get closer to the subject; "Two rules in photography: One. Get Close. Two: Get closer still." (who's quote?) The little Leica's small size and unobtrusiveness allowed to me to take it everywhere and learn about street shooting using depth of field. One day at Paddington Station, an old gent came up to me. 'Leica, eh? the best.' I was still a student and this meant loads to me. "I'll tell you how to get correct exposures without a meter. Say you have 100 asa film. Set shutter to 1/100. Bright day use f16. Slightly cloudy f8. Overcast: f4. Just remember to set the shutter to the reciprocal of the film speed and adjust accordingly..." So the Weston Master IV had to be relied on less and less. One day I found an old 1960s copy of Leica Fotografie, in German. There inside was a picture of "Leicamann". A guy with an M-2, demonstrating how to hold the camera vertically. That had me sold. I wanted to be Leicamann. Urbane, cosmopolitan, several notches above the photoproletarians with their Chinons and Cosinas with add-on motordrives, zooms and cheap hammerhead flashguns. I then realised I had become a camera snob. Not for me was impressing the unsophisticated. I wanted to impress the cognoscenti. A year past, into my first job. I found an M2, battered, brassy but usable for 125 pounds in North London. Months elapsed before I could afford a lens for it. A 35mm Summicron M-from-screw conversion. 150 pounds at City Camera Exchange (Waterloo) New Year sale. Now I was in business. I took some of my best stuff with that camera and lens, b&w of people out and about, documentary pics of elderly Poles living in Britain, landscapes, transport themes, all developed and printed at home in my darkroom (Gamer enlarger, EL-Nikkor 50mm f2.8 lens). Right up to 20x16. As income became more and more disposable, so the Leica obsession got a grip. Lenses, yeah, you can justify. But I started buying stuff I didn't *need* (just *craved*). Like a second body (near-mint M3 S/S) and a third body (used but useable M4). And last year an M6. One day, in Fox Talbot, Tottenham Court Road, I was looking at a used M6. 'Too much'. That very moment, a guy walked in of the street wanting to sell *his* M6 to Fox Talbot. The shop assistant offered him 500 pounds less than the price their M6 was displayed at. I 'pssst'd' the guy, we went outside and I offered him the chance to split the difference. Next day we did the deal (after I'd checked his M6 - perfect then, perfect now). Since then, the M6 is with me on all shoots (my new Minolta TC-1 being with me EVERY day). The light meter has added a new ease to Leica photography. I still miss shots through lack of autofocus and autoexposure. But 17 years with Leica M and much of the process becomes instinctive. And I have a cheap way to satisfy the equipment craving; I collect old Soviet rangefinders. Each Sunday, Warsaw plays host to one of Europe's largest regular camera fairs, the Gielda Fotograficzna at the Stodola. 30,000 sq ft of stands. Upstairs you get the Russians, bringing in all maner of FEDs, Zorkis, Kievs, all at bargain-basement prices. The going rate for a Kiev 4 (Contax II copy) is 70 zloties - less than 20 bucks. Lenses, viewfinders, all there. Incidentally, a mecca for Leica fakes and forgeries - gold Leicas, Wehrmacht and Luftwaffe Leicas, all mint fakes made from Zorkis and FEDs. Good to have got that off my chest and shared it with people who *understand*