Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Gee.....if only some of us would have an opportunity to meet with Leica representatives and tell them these things.... Dan C. At 07:50 AM 02-10-98 -0500, you wrote: >Bill, > >I'm with you and Lucien. I certainly don't want to spend 2,000 bucks (at >least) for a feature I never felt the lack of on my M6. I think an M and a >flash are not good companions and even if one needs flash for some kind of >shots I don't think TTL in an M can improve that much over a well trained >manual technique. Just my personal opinion,though. >So, 2,000 dollars for a third (useless) led? For a cheap speed dial? >Nah, much better to spend in lenses...waiting for the new millenium M7. > >Ernesto=20 > >-----Original Message----- >From: Bill Erfurth [mailto:m6rf@yahoo.com] >Sent: venerd=EC 2 ottobre 1998 4.36 >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: [Leica] M6TTL desirable??? > > >Jim Brick wrote: >>=20 >> Are you the only LUGger to want one? >>=20 >> Enquiring minds want to know. > :) >>Jim, > >>It's funny that the new M6TTL seem to attract=20 >>much less attention on the LUG than the M6 0,85 >>few months ago. >>;-) >>Lucien > >Hi Lucien, > >I think you observation is right on. > >You have heard of the Leica mystique...well, I think this is the Leica >mistake. > >Leica has not offered enought of an incentive for existing M6 users >to up grade. Nor are the changes great enough to bring in new >customers. > >If you want to know weather or not my observation is correct, just >watch the net selling price (after rebates). > >Regards, >Bill > > > > > > > >=20 >_________________________________________________________ >DO YOU YAHOO!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > >