Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/08/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]John Chapman wrote: > Hi Luggers, > Alex Merz wrote that dynamic range was more important than resolution > per se. Dynamic range is completely dependent on the resolution you scan > at that is a given. > After that other variables are introduced such as the tonal curve of the > driver software > and the file format in which the scanned image is saved in. The reason that I emphasize dynamic range over resolution is that for electronic publication, resolution will be much worse than in ink, dye, or Ag-emulsion output. But with a good monitor, the dynamic range of displayed values can be MUCH greater than with the above output technologies. Even cheap scanners give greater (nominal) resolution than your screen can conveniently display, but cheap units will not *begin* to extract the shadow detail from a typical 35mm transparency. If you're scanning negatives - especially thin, color ones - this matters a lot less (and anyhow, thin negatives are sharper!). While high resolution will improve dynamic range for very small areas of highlight or shadow, dynamic range is NOT solely a function of resolution, and the Dmax for a given detection system is not resolution dependant. This is an issue that we confront all the time in biological fluorescence microscopy, where a sensitive detector will allow us to visualise structures that are substantially (1-2 orders of magnitude) smaller than the theoretical resolution limit, and where we must often balance detection sensitivity, spatial resolution, and temporal resolution (frames/sec). At a given temporal resolution, increases in spatial resolution often mandate a DECREASE in dynamic range. On topic, our best microscope is a laser scanning confocal unit manufactured by Leica, and with it we routinely approach the theoretical limits of optical resolution (~100 nm point resolution). It's a great instrument with superlative optics, though the UI of the driver software is truly awful... .......................................................................... Alexey Merz | URL: http://www.webcom.com/alexey | email: alexey@webcom.com | PGP public key: http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu/ | voice:503/494-6840