Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/08/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Luggers, Alex Merz wrote that dynamic range was more important than resolution per se. Dynamic range is completely dependent on the resolution you scan at that is a given. After that other variables are introduced such as the tonal curve of the driver software and the file format in which the scanned image is saved in. My reading of Pascal's original post was that he was seeking advice on desktop slide scanners. Without knowing his budget we can only speculate as to what scanning solution are appropriate for him but I don't think drum scanners figure in his options. I have personally used most of the slide scanners around. From my point of view working in reportage Nikon are clear winners. The Kodak machines are just too big for fieldwork unless you are working from a static location for a period of time. But the quality is better. Regarding storage and file size a hign capacity external hard drive say 4 to 10 gigabytes and a zip drive to send images for publication. Zip's have toppled Syquest as medium of choice for sending files for output. As has Iomega's Jazz drive for larger removable storage requirements. Lastly, the best way to ensure your scanned images look the way you intend is to scan it yourself. Using Photoshop's very powerful suite of image manipulation tools you can bring out the best in Leica glass digitally. John Chapman http://www.fotografie.demon.co.uk