Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]What does Canon have that is better than the S1? Do you know anything about the $5000 3CCD Canon digital video recorder? Is this what you are referring to? Francesco At 05:44 AM 6/22/98 , you wrote: >At 02:57 AM 6/22/98 -0400, you wrote: >> >>The days of emulsion film are numbered. When you see an entire photo >dept. at >>a major newspaper or news agency go digital, look out, its here! News >footage >>used to be done on film until video proved better. > >Not even close. News photography has special needs that make digital >imaging compelling regardless of the compromise of quality. When you're >printing on toilet paper, it really doesn't matter that much if you don't >have to absolute best image quality. > >On another point, Canon is THE leader in digital imaging now. Leica has to >be in second place with the S1. Nikon's (Fuji's) and Minolta's digital >cameras are jokes in comparison. Two totally different approaches to >digital imaging, but for each purpose, the cameras are very impressive. But >they won't hurt film until the S3 comes out the size of an M6 with 150 meg >image file size, and the equivalent of 100-3200 ISO available. Then I'll >sell my R and M bodies and digitize all my photos. > >Other approaches to photography that required 35mm cameras won't be >converting en mass to digital for some time to come. There's lots of time >left. >-- > >Eric Welch >St. Joseph, MO >http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch > >It is of interest to note that while some dolphins are reported to have >learned English...no human being has been reported to have learned >dolphinese. > >Carl Sagan >