Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 16:03 10/05/98 -0400, you wrote: <snip> >>>I'm through with this, I don't have time to defend against such petty >>>sniping. >> >>Yes you do. You live for it. hehehehehehe > >This is called trolling. This guy will say anything to get a reaction from >this mailing list. The best thing would be for everyone to ignore him. >Behavior like this usually gets people banned from IRC chat channels, and >I think that the same policy should apply to mailing lists. >Dan C. Without commenting on recent discussions on the LUG, I think it is a fact of life that some net users do try to involve Leica users in pointless arguments. It happens a lot on newsgroups, but it can happen here too. Not everbody who subscribes to the Leica users list is interested in using Leicas! Whether the "bait" is Leica being "too expensive to justify owning one" , or whether it is "Nikon do it better" (?) (or Canon, or whatever), it is as well to be aware that an angry or argumentative response is just what is wanted in such situations. The idea of trolling is to start, and perpetuate, ongoing pointless arguments, for the amusement of the person who starts it, and possibly others who may be spectators. Leica users seem to get a bit more than their share of this because there is a certain amount of jealousy to contend with on the part of people who think that no-one should own equipment that is <better than/more expensive than/has lenses better than> theirs. Whether that belief is based in political correctness or simple prejudice and envy, it is all the same thing in practice- silly arguments for the purpose of "getting at" people who own Leicas. It is not unlikely that this list will get such people subscribing for exactly that purpose, from time to time. Since a response (and another, and another...) is what is desired, no response is a good way to deal with it. Joe Berenbaum