Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] RE Jim Brick's 'lightweight' kit
From: Five Senses Productions <fls@5senses.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 14:20:05 -0700

You would dare give up the AWESOME 100 APO for a zoom lens???

At 09:44 PM 4/19/98 -0700, Jim Brick wrote:
>At 06:56 PM 4/19/98 -0700, you wrote:
>>	I thought I'd never see the day when a 15mm and a 180 f2.8 would become
>>part of someone's lightweight kit.  Do you own a mule too?  I appreciate
>>the need to be prepared, but that seems like a lot of weight - the trick
>>must be in the packing! ;)
>>
>>James
>> 
>
>There are M photographers and R photographers and mixed. There are street
>photographers and landscape photographers and mixed. To some an M2 + 35/2
>is a lightweight kit. To some an R8 and 400/2.8 is a lightweight kit.
>Everything is relative. Relative as to what kind of photography one usually
>does, and relative to what equipment one normally takes along on an
>escapade. Had I said 19mm and 135mm as the short and long, would you have
>the same reaction? What I am going to take to Europe will cover all of the
>things I want to photograph, in the manner that I want to photograph them.
>If you haven't experienced a 15/3.5 Super Elmar, you wouldn't understand. M
>people slobber over the Noctilux. To R people, the 15mm Super Elmar is like
>manna from heaven. Experience is the best teacher. I may replace the 100
>APO and 180/2.8 with my 70-180. Two for one. So then it would be four
>lenses. 15, 28, 50, 70-180. Is that better?
>
>Jim
> 


Francesco Sanfilippo,
Five Senses Productions
webmaster@5senses.com


http://www.5senses.com/