Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi, Carl and other Leicaphiles; I mostly agree with your comments. I don't judge photos, but I do judge beer (really!), and the considerations are very similar. (If my only comment is that your beer has a nice color, you can be sure that there's something wrong with it!) However, this approach is essentially a compromise between being informative and being supportive; it's appropriate for people who are either beginners and therefore easily discouraged (we don't want them to stop taking photos or making beer; we just want them to to do a better job of it) or are very sensitive to criticism. When dealing with one's peers in a field, on the other hand, I don't think that it's as important to sugar-coat criticism. You certainly don't want to be rude, but you can and should be direct. And, it's important to criticize constructively rather than insult; the primary difference is that with constructive criticism, you make an effort to at least identify specifics of what the problem is, and ideally suggest a solution. And, despite my earlier comment about sugar-coating, it's never a bad idea to point out something that you like. Here are some beer examples: Bad: Your beer sucks. Not useful: I don't care for this beer. Good, but direct: Your beer has an unpleasant chemical-like flavor. Good with sugar coating: Great aroma! The flavor is a bit chemical-like, though. Better: Your beer has an unpleasant chemical-like flavor. Be very careful to completely remove any sanitizers that you've used in your equipment before using it. Bruce > From: Carl Socolow <csocolow@microserve.net> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Cool Leica Pictures > > When I judge for the local camera club a couple times a year I see > brilliant images and those that need improvement. For the latter, I will > not say they are inferior or do nothing for me. I will tell the > submitter where I think it can be corrected whether framing, > composition, exposure, conceptualization. But it's always positive and > helps someone grow. If I don't like the image content but like the > technique I would say that the subject matter is not what I would > photograph. That doesn't make the photo invalid. And I will extol the > technique and point out its strengths. Everyone wins.