Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Eric for sharing your images. I take this opportunity to raise a question that has been bugging me for some time: the useability of Web technology for the observation of pictures. Looking at your photography site, as much as looking at almost anyone else's, gives the viewer an opportunity to get a remote, general, idea of the type of pictures you enjoy taking or the ones that are your bread and butter. It certainly does NOT give any idea of the qualities of a lens or of an emulsion. It can even destroy the subtilities of the dynamic range of a rich slide or of a hand printed enlargement and thus become counter-productive. The various 'jumps' of treason levels during the picture digitalisation process are enormous: scanner performance, operator's workstation screen calibration, operator's software action, destruction of image information through compression, viewer's graphic card and monitor settings, all add up to caricature the original picture. In a way similar to what low end brutal screening and cheap paper can do for printed media. To be even more radical: none of the images you show on your site (nor any of the images I would be able to show on a site of my own) would render any differently if you had used cheap P&S hardware instead of Leicas. Or even recent digital cameras (with the million + pixels CCDs). The only way round this would be to put uncompressed high res TIFF files on line. Unviewable by 99 pct of Web users. The only things that survive Web browsing might be the essential ones: the relevance of the image, the idea or feeling it chooses to convey or the documentary value it brings. But it certainly is not a good showcase of technical performance. It can be cruel in the sense that it strips the 'glitter' out of the image, and leaves only the barest level of information. Maybe Web imaging requires a new way of creating the images, with Web usage as the main objective even at the shooting stage, and attention concentrated on the strengths and weaknesses of this particular application: the technology allows the creation of 'living' images, loaded with 'inner' animation, timed transformation, etc. Anyone care to share his/her thoughts on this ? Alan Brussels-Belgium Eric Welch wrote: > > I've added to my web page (address below) a section called "Cool Leica > pictures." In addition to a few of my favorites of recent vintage, I've > added a special group of pictures I took last week. > http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch