Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 98-01-15 21:44:45 EST, GH write: << The light entering the lens forms the shape of a cone, determined by the angle of view of the lens. As long as the edges of the hood lie just outside this incident cone of light there will be no vignetting and the hood should operate most efficiently, no? >> GH No, that's not right; it's a matter of geometry. Place yourself at the film plane and consider all of the light that is coming toward the camera from the scene in front of the camera. Ideally, you don't want any light striking the front lens element that is not part of the scene that is to be imaged on the film. If you trace the outer-most edge of the film from the film, through the lens and out the front element, you will see that just in front of the front lens element the envelop of light rays that falls just outside the film at the film plane makes the outline of a square or rectangle that is the exact shape of the film format. A round lens shade, to allow light to cover the corners of the film, must necessarily allow light from a sharper angle than is necessary to enter the lens barrel on the sides of the image. That is extraneous light that could cause scattering and, therefore, loss of contast, or even flare (if Leica lenses were susceptible to flare). The only way a round lens shade could be more efficient that a square or rectangular one is if you are using a round film format -- like in the very first Kodaks. Charlie