Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/05/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> When the shoe is on the other foot and it involves the philosophy, > concept, life and times, we know the techie folks get antsy, as we > have seen with Roger and his "mental masturbation" about what drives > some of us. I get antsy, Ted, because it is so parochial to think of one's "philosophy" of photography as being marque oriented. As I might have said in private communications, the agenda oriented journalism is being done by users of all marques, in fact, overwhelmingly with other brands. Far better fora exist for these discussions. Fora that would excite you guys, who like those discussions, far more than this one simply because it would put you into a larger arena with a far more diverse subscriber list. Maybe the photographer out there pushing a point of view with an EOS1n or an F5 really *can* bring back a larger number of "moving" images than the Leica shooter. 8^) I'm not a collector or techie in any way. In fact, I'm loving the current "bokeh" thread in which I find Patrick's thinking so very much like mine. That thread can hardly be considered collector or techie oriented, but can be considered as Leica oriented because the subject of glow/bokeh, I think, literally originated with western Leica users and is in no way incomprehensible to westerers I can't presume to keep your threads of interest off this list; I wouldn't presume to regardless. That hammer is only owned by the listowner. If you do persist here, then, at least, clearly label the subject line so that those like me who don't get off on that topic can easily delete and move on. - -- Roger Beamon Naturalist & Photographer Docent: Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Leica Historical Society Of America mailto:beamon@primenet.com You can't win department: Why is it that paychecks come less taxes, whereas, everything you buy is plus taxes?