Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/04/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Perhaps my experiences will be helpful to those interested in photographing the comet. I drove way out in the country last Sunday night to escape city lights and found a very remote country lane far from car headlights and farmhouse lights. A flashlight is virtually essential. I used old reliable, Leica M3 which is auto-nothing, because it does not have a mirror and other gadgets to interfere with its operation. I set the 90 mm lens on infinity and aperture wide open (f 2.8). It was necessary to shine a flashlight towards the front side of the camera to illuminate the frames to properly position the comet on the film. I used a locking cable release to make a wide variety of time exposures. An exposure of one minute using Tri-X film gave an acceptable image of its two tails although it overexposed the head and resulted in star traces. 400 Delta gave poor results. Binoculars help pass the time while waiting on completion of the exposures. I developed the Tri-X with D-76 diluted 1:1 for 10 minutes at 68=B0. The negatives are very difficult to print because of the tremendous spread in image density. An extremely bright comet head against a black sky with fading tails is a tough combination to print. I used Ilford MGIV as the paper. Multigrade filter 5 gave the longest tails against a black sky, but produced a very grainy picture. Filter 0.5 was terrible; the tails could hardly be seen when the sky was printed black; of course a light gray sky will show the tails nicely. Filters 2 and 3 seem to be an acceptable compromise. By the way, you will be amazed at the number of stars in the pictures. Glen Robinson