Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/04/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The CLE has exposure compensation facility. Pablo ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: CLE vs. Leica Author: joe@azurite.demon.co.uk at @UCSD Date: 11/04/1996 8:41 PM In message <199604111639.JAA23564@dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com>, Stephen Gandy <cameras@ix.netcom.com> writes >It's the currently the only way to get aperture priority automation >with Leica lenses. It has an accurate electronic shutter and >metering system which..alas..does not work when the batteries >die. It's only design fault is that the meter does not >function when the camera is switched off AE priority. Am I right in thinking that the CLE has no exposure lock or exposure compensation facility? If so, wouldn't this make getting accurate exposures on slide film a bit difficult? -- joe b. >-- Saved internet headers (useful for debugging) >Received: from UCSD.EDU by mail.ucsd.edu; id PAA15412 sendmail 8.6.12/UCSD-2.2- >Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [192.147.236.1] (mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [19 >Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA00212; Thu, 11 Apr 96 14:37:49 -0700 >Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA00191; Thu, 11 Apr 96 14:37:22 -0700 >Received: from post.demon.co.uk ([158.152.1.72]) by relay-2.mail.demon.net >Received: from azurite.demon.co.uk ([158.152.206.50]) by relay-3.mail.demon.net >Message-Id: <kj3llBBNBWbxEwjW@azurite.demon.co.uk> >Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 20:41:01 +0100 >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >From: "joe b." <joe@azurite.demon.co.uk> >Subject: Re: CLE vs. Leica >In-Reply-To: <199604111639.JAA23564@dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com> >Mime-Version: 1.0 >X-Mailer: Turnpike Version 1.11 <o1driLLSWkkwIdz7lucp4Q5JGm> >Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us