Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2024/03/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Q vs M unloved ancient only 24mp M240 (et al MP 262 etc)
From: reid at mejac.carlsbad.ca.us (Brian Reid)
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 04:47:22 -0800
References: <D9395AAC-19C1-4F8C-B84C-19EAAC81AD0F@teleport.com>
 
I tried hard to understand what you just wrote. Failed.
-- 

> On Mar 5, 2024, at 21:09, Mark Kronquist via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> 
> wrote:

> As with all things in this cult called Leica (which I gleefully belong 
> to) the 24MP M240 (et al) seems to be the unloved step child of the 
> line (at the moment (but then so was the M8 until i wrote that 
> unfortunate because I have only one $500 one article about the M8 and 
> IR and M8 and Monochrome for LHSA et al...and before the M9 was tied to 
> Paul Simon Kodachrome cult song....the (disdained video ick well don't 
> use it), 2mm thicker (really) returned awesoem images (instagram 
> kronquistm) and is two models behind the times (really M10/p use same 
> sensor) thus trash and well no Leica is cheap...but affordable...
Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Q vs M unloved ancient only 24mp M240 (et al MP 262 etc))
Reply from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] Q vs M unloved ancient only 24mp M240 (et al MP 262 etc))
 In reply to: Message from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] Q vs M unloved ancient only 24mp M240 (et al MP 262 etc))