Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2024/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Q vs M unloved ancient only 24mp M240 (et al MP 262 etc)
From: mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 21:09:54 -0800
References: <d2120601-b6fa-4538-907b-a7755874603c@iol.ie>
 
As with all things in this cult called Leica (which I gleefully belong to) 
the 24MP M240 (et al) seems to be the unloved step child of the line (at the 
moment (but then so was the M8 until i wrote that unfortunate because I have 
only one $500 one article about the M8 and IR and M8 and Monochrome for LHSA 
et al?and before the M9 was tied to Paul Simon Kodachrome cult song?.the 
(disdained video ick well don?t use it), 2mm thicker (really) returned 
awesoem images (instagram kronquistm) and is two models behind the times 
(really M10/p use same sensor) thus trash and well no Leica is cheap?but 
affordable?
Replies: Reply from bmwred735i at gmail.com (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Q vs M unloved ancient only 24mp M240 (et al MP 262 etc))
Reply from rclompus at mac.com (Richard Clompus) ([Leica] Review article of two Light Lens Lab prototype lenses)
 In reply to: Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] Faux Leica)