Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fuji v Leica, and Alamy
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 15:57:41 +0200
References: <D340F5D1.5DE9F%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Can we see some of those great Leica images you are shooting? Since you are 
obviously speaking from extensive personal experience.

Or maybe not.

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
<http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
<http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
YNWA













> On 23 Apr 2016, at 15:50, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> 
> I can not keep track of all these cameras as to what is what so the first
> thing I do is do a Bing search for Fujifilm X-Pro1 Mirrorless Digital 
> Camera
> (Body Only)  and I get $499.00 at B&H and its not clear if its new or used 
> I
> think its new when I look further I see that in 2012 when it came out it 
> was
> selling for $1200. And its a  cropped format camera. This is a camera which
> compares with a full frame Leica M camera body how? Do we blur our eyes and
> pretending we are looking at the same thing here?
> This is a camera obviously marketed to the the mass hipster market



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Fuji v Leica, and Alamy)