Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMGS: Tests with MM and M246
From: john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:43:12 +0000
References: <CA+yJO1A2N2yntQ0J1OG8OQeg4qf1Dy3M-WqLpWnX4r__p_KL1Q@mail.gmail.com>

Not on a tripod so hard to compare (viewpoint changes), look for tonality 
differences at 320-1600asa as the 246 is better at +5000asa

john

-----Original Message-----

PESO:

I did some tests with the Noctilux and Summilux on the MM and M246.  I have 
a hard time telling the files apart.  I did notice that neither camera 
records the aperture correctly because all of the photos were either shot 
wide open or at F/8 and they were not recorded that way.  I also shot some 
with both cameras at ISO 6400 but that was not recorded either. The M246 
files are about half the size of the MM files.  These are the ones shot with 
the 50/1.4:

http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/162551679

and hit next until the end.  These have absolutely nothing done to them 
except importing into LR as raw files and exporting to pBase as jpegs. I'll 
post the Noctilux ones later.

Tina

--
Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/



Replies: Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Tests with MM and M246)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Tests with MM and M246)