Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Which has more central Resolution: Sony 28-70 or Leica 28-70?
From: john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster)
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 09:34:54 +0100
References: <001b01d12fa9$62e55430$28affc90$@verizon.net> <CAH1UNJ0=2dE_HRgWoVeTwcgR4NxXZ+UJjSM9XdjyN4nebFgzBA@mail.gmail.com>
 
I don't think I have seen anybody call them better than Otus ;-) Better
value for money certainly...

john

-----Original Message-----

Sigma make lenses nowadays, the "Art" line, which are as good or better than
the Zeiss "Otus" line for Nikon DSLRs, and with autofocus to boot. Both
Sigma and Tamron make premium lenses nowadays that match or better the
equivalent Nikon offerings at a very competitive price.
If you are a Nikon DSLR user, it is hard to ignore these lenses nowadays.

I presume the logic holds for Canon as well, but as I have not used that
combo, I am not sure.

Cheers
Jayanand
In reply to: Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Which has more central Resolution: Sony 28-70 or Leica 28-70?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Which has more central Resolution: Sony 28-70 or Leica 28-70?)