Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/11/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I really think you have gone off the deep end. What is dumbed down about the new M? It removes features that I and many others have no use for?video and live view. It has the same sensor as the M240 about which you have wet dreams. So what is your problem? Maybe money is no object for you?I guess that is why you only talk about Leica but shoot Nikon?for those of us who live in the real world the idea of getting a product without unneeded costly features but with the same image quality as the more expensive model is quite attractive. Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA > On 19 Nov 2015, at 20:21, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > > Is someone who can gather 5 grand together for a camera not able to gather > 7? > Buying a new M and saving money do not go together. Its not a saving money > kinds of deal. Its a spending a huge amount of money kind of deal. > Buying an older used M and saving money might make a small amount of sense. > A every frustrating situation the idea of buying a dumbed down M. Dumbed > down for the masses of really stupid rich people who always feel like a > buck > has to somehow be saved regardless of the consequences. A lot of those > around. "what's your BEST PRICE"?!? > >