Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/05/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have a strong preference for the second crop. I think that the added space on the bottom in the square crop does not contribute to the image. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator YNWA > On 25 May 2015, at 11:54, Philippe <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> wrote: > > TIA for letting me know which of these crops works better, if either does, > and why if you have time to explain. > FYI, my doubts come from a different perception when seen small or large, > so thanks for your precious feedback. > > SWH 2 > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Doulce+France/Somewhereheim--2.jpg.html > SWH 3 > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Doulce+France/Somewhereheim--3.jpg.html > > Amities > Philippe, sorry for duplicates. > > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ > >