Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2014/10/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Digital M product no breakdown
From: red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 06:11:35 -0700
References: <CAFuU78cxkqVhq4q0yo4QASxLLQDrRM4hShw4bt-h+0AKMet3Yg@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9010E9B1C77@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CAF8hL-EoDeG9_WJSwHMYX1BQWthsbF=ugncKH3xQo6U2CstQ6g@mail.gmail.com> <54378BD0.5010507@gmx.de>
As explained when Leica first came out with the M, it is an exercise in
branding. That the M lasts forever. Timeless. Without change.
Personally, I thought it was mindless.
Still do.
Frank Filippone
Red735i at verizon.net
On 10.10.2014 02:47, Richard Man wrote:
> When they started to call the products Leica M, and Leica S, Leica X etc.
> some said, that will cause confusion! and Leicapjiles raised up and
> said, no it won't, it's Leica M Type 240, and S 006 etc. Now we see
> the effect, we have Leica M, M-P which is different from MP, M Edition
> 60, M this and that.
>
> So much clearer now!! Ha!
>
> Give me the old M2, M3, M4, M4P etc. naming any day!
>
Replies:
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Digital M product no breakdown)
In reply to:
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] Digital M product no breakdown)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Digital M product no breakdown)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Digital M product no breakdown)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Digital M product no breakdown)