Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/02/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMGS: FLASH!! vs No Flash
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 22:01:42 +0100
References: <CA+yJO1AnLVkugCRvOz7agAxFaYKrmhfUO5d3+nseNbL4DN6oyw@mail.gmail.com> <D0613E3D-9906-489E-8ABD-4F2E2BC10A25@frozenlight.eu> <CAE3QcF73Xn8x+e3jTzwjFyWFspMLfoQ2qstdjmGWjjVyLv82BA@mail.gmail.com>

Colour--OK; we have to make allowances for modern conveniences. But for the 
rest, you are a heretic.

:-)

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

YNWA









On Feb 20, 2014, at 9:46 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> Well it's the wrong tool for the styles of Tina or Nathan or Lluis or Doug
> etc etc. It's a superb if not essential tool in other environments. My M
> and a borrowed S never disintegrated despite my wilful heresy in studio
> locations. Geesh I even stop down my lenses frequently AND shoot for colour
> if that's what I am after.
> 
> 
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> 
> 
> On 21 February 2014 04:24, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote:
> 
>> Fully agree. Flash is evil.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Nathan
>> 
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>> 
>> YNWA
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 



In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: FLASH!! vs No Flash)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMGS: FLASH!! vs No Flash)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMGS: FLASH!! vs No Flash)