Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Thoughts about black and white...
From: amr3 at uwm.edu (Alan Magayne-Roshak)
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:51:10 -0500 (CDT)

On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com>wrote:
Subject: Re: [Leica] Thoughts about black and white...

>Leonardo da Vinci
>?  did not have a camera, but he did his paintings in color.  His drawings
>were often  duotones.

>You don't often encounter portraits painted in black and white.

>I never see flowers in nature that are black and white.
================================================================================================================================================
But there were paintings in monochrome.   It's known as grisaille.

Here is an excerpt from Wikipedia, and the full link.

Grisaille
>From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Grisaille (/?r??za?/ or /?r??ze?l/; French: gris [??izaj] 'grey') is a term 
for painting executed entirely in monochrome or near-monochrome, usually in 
shades of grey. It is particularly used in large decorative schemes in 
imitation of sculpture. Many grisailles in fact include a slightly wider 
colour range, like the Andrea del Sarto fresco illustrated. Paintings 
executed in brown are sometimes referred to by the more specific term 
brunaille, and paintings executed in green are sometimes called verdaille.[1]
A grisaille may be executed for its own sake, as underpainting for an oil 
painting (in preparation for glazing layers of colour over it), or as a 
model for an engraver to work from. "Rubens and his school sometimes use 
monochrome techniques in sketching compositions for engravers."[2] Full 
colouring of a subject makes many more demands of an artist, and working in 
grisaille was often chosen as being quicker and cheaper, although the effect 
was sometimes deliberately chosen for aesthetic reasons. Grisaille paintings 
resemble the drawings, normally in monochrome, that artists from the 
Renaissance on were trained to produce; like drawings they can also betray 
the hand of a less talented assistant more easily than a fully coloured 
painting.

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grisaille>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And I don't feel art has to reproduce nature.  

I offer a quote from Goethe, during a discussion on a Rubens landscape in 
which two sources of light can be seen - 
"The double lighting is definitely a violation - a violation of nature, if 
you like.  But if it is a violation of nature, I add immediately that it is 
superior to nature.
I say that this is a master stroke, and proves that with genius art is not 
entirely subject to the necessities imposed by nature but has laws of its 
own."
- From Eckerman's "Conversations" 1827.

Alan

Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Photo Services
(Retired)
UPAA POY 1978
amr3 at uwm.edu
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/

"All the technique in the world doesn't compensate
 for an inability to notice. " - Elliott Erwitt



Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Fwd: Thoughts about black and white...)