Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Digital M lens compatibility
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 22:41:28 +0000
References: <CAFuU78c7HxeoAJSkPVnh7SibWuerczMOeykEccFXGVNrSqAF+A@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9C563C271@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CAFuU78e2qAQC7kM1vA-aTJvHv9OT-TrqJCo-zASm7L6iy92VWg@mail.gmail.com>
 
The current 90mm Macro-Elmar? Yes, it does not retract into the body

john

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> So the 90/4 summy macro is ok in all configurations?
> 
> -Lew Schwartz
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:16 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz>
> wrote:
> 
> > It is quicker to say which ones don't ;-) It is about 4 lenses AFAIR...
> >
> > 50mm Summicron DR (can be butchered to work) and 21mm Super
> Angulon
> > were the most likely ones to not work (15mm Hologon being somewhat
> > rare and I think the other is an early 35mm Summilux with infinity
> > lock)
> >
> > john
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >
> > > Can someone point me to a resource that spells out which M mount
> > > lenses can still be used on Leica M 9's and beyond (irrespective of
> > > coding)? I
> > pretty
> > > sure I had it once, but I've lost track.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > -Lew Schwartz
> > >
Replies: Reply from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] Digital M lens compatibility)
 In reply to: Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] Digital M lens compatibility)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Digital M lens compatibility)
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] Digital M lens compatibility)