Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] obviously subjective - yet interesting
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 22:15:17 +0000
References: <C92D275D-3ED3-456B-A979-E9ECFE88DD40@mac.com> <D70230E2-9671-4A51-AC10-DF613D7CDED5@sfr.fr> <66820F5A-F2B1-4D62-962A-933E6230BF79@mac.com>
 
I had a D800E for about 8 months, I have shot over 3 times as much in less 
than 3 weeks with the M and far prefer the output....

john

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> 
> On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:59 AM, philippe.amard wrote:
> 
> > Repat the same experiment at, say, 12800 ISO ;-)
> 
> > Le 7 juin 13 ? 17:46, George Lottermoser a ?crit :
> >
> >> <http://www.stephenbartelsgallery.com/blog/nikon-d800e-v-leica-
> m9.html>
> 
> Would if I could.
> Wish I had both (or either) kits in my possession. ;~(
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] obviously subjective - yet interesting)
 In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] obviously subjective - yet interesting)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] obviously subjective - yet interesting)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] obviously subjective - yet interesting)