Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica M (Type 240) Experience
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 05:57:15 +0000
References: <25200607.1370229850513.JavaMail.root@elwamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9C558F26A@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <1C425EC6-8BCC-4D28-A616-019AC6228E25@gmail.com>

It was trying to quantify the delay, you notice it but would be hard pushed 
to time it...

john

> at 30x the price it's faster...
> Steve Barbour

> -----Original Message-----
>
> 
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 9:52 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:
> 
> It is there but it does not feel sluggish, it is nothing like the lag on a 
> P&S for
> example
> 
> 
> john
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > Bill Nelsch wrote:
> >
> >> I am still wondering about how the Type 240 works with R lenses?
> >> Does the focus assist really work with R lenses?  Since you can only
> >> use the EVF to focus the R lens does that mean that all of your shots
> >> are going to have the shutter delay?  So far I haven't read any user
> >> experience vis a vis the red headed stepchild R system and before I
> >> bail on my DMR I would really like to know if this is in fact an "R 
> >> Solution"?
> >
> > The reported shutter delay means it's not the R solution for me.
> >
> > Doug Herr
> > Birdman of Sacramento
> > http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> 


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica M (Type 240) Experience)
Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica M (Type 240) Experience)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Leica M (Type 240) Experience)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica M (Type 240) Experience)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Leica M (Type 240) Experience)