Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Mark's 5.6 and be there - Mark
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 04:52:15 +0000
References: <CA+yJO1Dz+n11f9ZmS3vKTgAqoCB4gBOZv+Kuz9=0n2=yYsU3tw@mail.gmail.com> <CDBF200A.9BE7%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
Focussing is fussier on digital with Noctilux and 75mm Summilux compared to 
film, the new M will allow those to be focussed by EVF/LCD if 
required/desired.

john

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> It was not one of those lenses which were tricky on an M9 you had to send 
> it
> in or something.
> I was just reading Erwin was saying the problems with the 90 Apo asph on 
> the
> M9 or a myth. Not his words. By far.
> As that's a main lens for me that bit of info gets my interest.
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/19/13 6:32 PM, "Tina Manley" <images at comporium.net> wrote:
> 
> > Has to be.  No reason it would not be.
> >
> > Tina
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Its not clear to me if I do land a new M240 if the f1 is doable on it
> >> or not. I'm thinking it would be.
> >>
> >>
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Mark's 5.6 and be there - Mark)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Mark's 5.6 and be there - Mark)