Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
From: wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 21:21:29 -0800 (GMT-08:00)

Steve Barbour 

>
>On Nov 27, 2012, at 8:55 PM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> 
>wrote:
>
>> Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Jon,
>>> You can make out with JPGs? You have much better eyesight than I have!
>>> 
>> 
>> Richard Man wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Jon, fairy dust sprinkled by the Leica wizards!!!
>>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:40 PM, jon.streeter <jon.streeter at cox.net> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> When I see Leica photos posted here, they seem to have a sharpness and,
>>>> sometimes, luminescence, beautiful bokeh, microcontrast perhaps, that 
>>>> sets
>>>> them apart from other cameras with sensors rated higher by DXO.  But 
>>>> it's
>>>> hardly a meaningful test since I've been a Leica fan since high school, 
>>>> so
>>>> I'm biased.  Furthermore, I know which photographs were done with Leica
>>>> glass.  Still, they do seem better, and I'm curious about how that's
>>>> possible if Leica sensors are so low in DXO's ratings.  Software?  
>>>> Lenses?
>>>> Superb photographers?
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> Several years ago when I used (briefly) a Canon L lens several people 
>> e-mailed after seeing the photos on my website and asked "What happened?  
>> You've lost some color and detail."
>
>
>
>or, as they say in words that seem appropriate, " a swallow does not a 
>summer make".
>


and a catchy sound bite doesn't make it any more true.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com