Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 400mm, cheap!
From: wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr)
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 15:40:36 -0800 (GMT-08:00)

Last spring I purchased a 560mm f/6.8 Telyt on the PIGRIFF-C focussing grip 
and at the same time I bought (separately) a Novoflex 400mm f/5.6 T-Noflexar 
(3-element) lens head to fit the PIGRIFF-C. The 400mm lens head was supposed 
to be a 'fun' lens and was very inexpensive.

A few weeks passed before I could test the T-Noflexar, and once I tried 
making photos with it I found out why it was so inexpensive: the image 
quality was TERRIBLE. I couldn't even discern a plane of focus. Oh well, it 
was inexpensive and supposed to be fun, so I just put it back in its bag and 
forgot about it for a while.

But... it kept nagging at me. My previous experience with two samples of the 
T-Noflexar was quite good, there had to be something wrong with this lens 
and I couldn't image it left the factory working that badly, which suggested 
that someone took the lens apart and mucked it up somehow.

A few days ago I started disassembly and once I had a good view of the rear 
of the optical unit my suspicions seemed to be confirmed: the retaining ring 
holding the rear element in place has some scratches on it.

I removed the rear element and flipped it around, re-assembled and the 
difference through the viewfinder was startling. The lens now has a very 
clear, sharp plane of focus and stuff pops in and out of focus just like it 
ought to.

I took it into the field today and found a willing subject, a Cattle Egret. 
The lighting was variable fog and the egret wanted me to make backlit photos 
(I was shooting from the shadow side).

The image detail is't APO but still quite good, contrast is a bit on the low 
side which meant that stretching the histogram to get a rich deep black and 
bright white might in some circumstances result in a loss of tonal 
gradation. Its color balance is clearly cooler than that of the 560mm f/6.8 
or 280mm f/4 APO but can be corrected most of the time.

Files made with the 280mm f/4 are much easier to work with, hold shadow and 
highlight detail better and the color quality is richer with fuller 
gradation, but for the price I paid for the T-Noflexar, about 1/20 the 
current market value of the 280 APO, I can't complain.  Sample:

http://wildlightphoto.com/temp/egret.jpg

a detail crop:

http://wildlightphoto.com/temp/egret_crop.jpg

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com




Replies: Reply from rsphotoimages at comcast.net (Bob Shaw) ([Leica] 400mm, cheap!)
Reply from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] 400mm, cheap!)
Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] 400mm, cheap!)
Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] 400mm, cheap!)