Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/10/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] FF - single rose
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:36:25 -0500
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E998ABBEE5@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <F47C842E-AE32-44A6-BCBD-DCDCB76CEFC0@mac.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99C8973B7@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org>
On Oct 18, 2012, at 1:32 PM, John McMaster wrote:
> Thanks George, is that a good thing?
>
> ;-) john
I think so ;~)
Back then "tonality" ruled.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
In reply to:
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] FF - single rose)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] FF - single rose)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] FF - single rose)