Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] FF - single rose
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:36:25 -0500
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E998ABBEE5@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <F47C842E-AE32-44A6-BCBD-DCDCB76CEFC0@mac.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99C8973B7@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org>

On Oct 18, 2012, at 1:32 PM, John McMaster wrote:

> Thanks George, is that a good thing?
> 
> ;-) john

I think so ;~)
Back then "tonality" ruled.

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist







In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] FF - single rose)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] FF - single rose)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] FF - single rose)