Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/09/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] So most rumours came true?
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:09:57 -0700
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99655A72D@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org> <BLU162-W54043ECD0C86A88F12A51E8C950@phx.gbl> <BLU162-W48206636FCAC87052198A48C950@phx.gbl> <ABA50EAE-13E0-447B-A6B3-7FC61815067A@usjet.net> <CAF8hL-G9CD8dD2u8oLD6SiJzsdf5dwOnOqAVYRiKfVFR1MtrUg@mail.gmail.com>
The M-E looks just like a M9? But may be at a lower price?
--
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
Replies:
Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Reply from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
In reply to:
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (vick.ko at sympatico.ca) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (vick.ko at sympatico.ca) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)