Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 50AA: What does it mean for film users?
From: john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 17:07:30 +1200
References: <031701cd3a93$b81db2d0$28591870$@earthlink.net> <CAJ3Pgh7wrutznWeGyyKe077vycU-8tmcYPKeXUUNu4QMWQvLMQ@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E971F25E86@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CAJ3Pgh6WG7rhtcgdnpEYLj8sPi8GwGmZDoK=PA40YDOJSZPMkA@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E971F2874D@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CAH1UNJ23Kq2YgqwV_7esonmnuAi51i32OHtBco0X_oOpvOk-ew@mail.gmail.com>

Or leading up to the price of a re-calculated Summilux well into five
figures....

john

-----Original Message-----

John,
IMHO, you got it all wrong - they will actually have more demand at full
price than at half price - that is the way the luxury market operates. (-:
Half price is generally only used for getting rid of unwanted stock, i.e.
spring cleaning!
Cheers
Jayanand

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 8:16 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
wrote:
> I doubt they could keep up with demand at half the price!
>
> john




In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] 50AA: What does it mean for film users?)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] 50AA: What does it mean for film users?)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] 50AA: What does it mean for film users?)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] 50AA: What does it mean for film users?)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] 50AA: What does it mean for film users?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 50AA: What does it mean for film users?)