Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] High ISO - now M9 and D3
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:29:59 -0500
References: <CAEFNq_Z_dE1_Dj8GfYPdB2mv9yQ+zXhZ_pqW-wkrsyk7c6ZavQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mar 16, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Benjamin Marks wrote:

> I use the M9 and the D3 and they compliment one another beautifully.   I
> would much rather shoot the M9 and the Zeiss 21/2.8 than the D3 and the
> 20/2.8 Nikkor (mechanical vignetting, ugh).  I would much rather shoot the
> D3 and the 105 DC than the M9 and the 90AA, or the D3 and the 180/2.8
> Nikkor than the M9 and the 135/4 or anything attached to a Visoflex.  The
> M9 is great at certain things and the D3 is great at certain things.

Aside from appropriate too for result desired and ergonomics

How would you describe and/or compare the image files
produced by each system?
and
Post processing procedures?


Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist







In reply to: Message from benmarks2005 at gmail.com (Benjamin Marks) ([Leica] High ISO - now M9 and D3)