Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom
From: john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:21:43 +1300
References: <CB1DDFD9.18281%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
I have latest versions of PS and LR, the former very rarely needs to be used
for what I do photographically. PS can do much more for many different types
of use whereas LR is dedicated to doing one thing well, why decry it so much
as it was developed solely for digital photography?

john

-----Original Message-----


If I spend ten minutes on an image which is typical I spend eight minutes in
ACR and two in PS5 (Photoshop).
The idea of not having those two minutes in PS5 is inconceivable to me.
Its inconceivable!
The metaphore for me is trying to develop and print your pictures on your
light table.
Wrong room.
Wrong tool.
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom)