Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]indeed!! the picture is incomplete for sure. she is definitely missing + missed :-) bharani Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:23:44 -0500 From: George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> Subject: Re: [Leica] my version of shulman's roving eye photo To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> Message-ID: <7C32665A-598B-44DD-9E58-DA023D868235 at mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII On Jul 16, 2011, at 7:25 PM, scleroplex <scleroplex at gmail.com> wrote: > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/scleroplex/scandalized+twin.jpg.html > > he was distracted by a particularly skimpy dress on a young woman walking by > and seemed to find it odd > i happened to click just as he initially turned Cute - but the fact that you need to tell us about subject of his gaze with words is a bit like the fisherman telling us about "the record breaking catch" with neither fish nor photo of same. ;-) George