Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank you for that Bharani. The LUG constantly surprises me with it's depth of informed and intelligent members. P. Paul Hardy Carter www.paulhardycarter.com www.theconstanteye.com www.twitter.com/paulhardycarter Skype: paulhardycarter Location and Directions Mobile: +44 (0)75 4018 1784 Studio: +44 (0)20 7277 0778 On 30 Jun 2011, at 02:25, scleroplex wrote: > greetings! > it is wrong to always assume good faith intentions behind official > policies. > > not only has photography by civilians in train stations been > prohibited by > the current government, > so has photography on any and all beaches in Mumbai. > > why? > > because having civilians taking photographs may be inconvenient in > case an > official story has to be cooked up. > it would not do to have photographic evidence by numerous random > people > contradicting the official facts. > > the banning of photos along Mumbai's beaches is particularly > relevant here > as numerous people along those very beaches > identified numerous people in the days leading up to the 2008 attack > on > Mumbai as suspicious and actually had photos of them. > and reported them to the Coast Guard as well as Mumbai police. > > this led to numerous questions as to why the relevant authorities > had not > taken steps to prevent the Mumbai attacks. > > there were at least 10 local people in Mumbai who were photographed by > civilians recce-ing the future landing zones on behalf of the Islamic > terrorists who eventually invaded those same beaches. > these people have not been arrested or brought to trial. > these were identified as henchmen of a notorious Mafia don called > Dawood > Ibrahim who is currently in Karachi. > > it will come as no surprise to Luggers therefore that the Minister > of Home > Affairs, responsible for Mumbai's security in 2008, > is back in that very same post. > his first response to the attacks of 2008 was "in large cities, such > small > accidents do happen". > > this same Minister was later photographed, yes photographed, > conferring with > aides of Dawood Ibrahim, > one of whom was later arrested for a terrorist attack in a different > Indian > state. > > see > http://ibnlive.in.com/news/rr-patils-underworld-connections/131936-37.html?from=tn > > > the next time around, there will be no civilians taking inconvenient > photos. > > when you have a government that clearly does not care about the > citizenry, > such prohibitions are inevitable. > > it is important to recognize this obvious lack of care, rather than > try > explaining it away as some bureaucratic snafu or stupid paranoia. > > this prohibition is not an accident. > it is deliberate deliberate policy. > > regards, > bharani >